In-Situ Balancing vs. Workshop Balancing: Which to Choose for Your Equipment?

There are two basic approaches to carrying out balancing work, each with its own advantages and limitations. The choice between balancing on a dedicated machine and balancing directly where the equipment is installed is not merely a question of convenience but a strategic decision that affects cost, downtime and the final result.

In this article we look at both methods in detail, analyse their strengths and weaknesses, and help you make an informed decision for your particular situation.

Method 1: Balancing on a balancing machine (in the workshop)

How it works

The component (rotor, shaft or impeller) is removed from the main equipment and taken to a dedicated balancing centre. There it is mounted on a high-precision balancing machine, which spins the rotor up to the required speed and performs all the necessary measurements and calculations.

Advantages

  • High balancing accuracy for an individual component: balancing machines provide precise measurement and make it possible to bring the residual imbalance below the tolerances set by the standards.
  • Controlled conditions: all operations are carried out in the workshop at an optimal temperature, free from external vibration and interference.
  • The option of accompanying work: turning, welding and the replacement of worn parts can be done at the same time.
  • A standardised process: especially useful when balancing series-produced parts.

Disadvantages

  • Long equipment downtime: it requires complete dismantling, transport and subsequent reassembly of the component. This can take days or even weeks.
  • High total cost: the price includes not only the balancing but also the dismantling, transport and reassembly.
  • It does not account for the system's influence: a rotor balanced perfectly on the machine may vibrate once installed in the unit, owing to the influence of couplings, bearings, the foundation or alignment.
  • Size limitations: not every machine is suitable for large or heavy rotors.

Method 2: In-situ balancing (where the equipment is installed)

How it works

Balancing is carried out directly on the customer's equipment, in its own bearings, without removing the rotor. A specialist with a portable vibration measurement system and a laser tachometer balances the unit at its working speed, right where it operates.

Diagram of sensor installation for in-situ balancing

Fig. 1. Sensor installation for in-situ balancing: 1, 2 - vibration sensors on the bearings, 3 - laser speed sensor, 4 - measurement unit, 5 - laptop with the software

Advantages

  • Minimal downtime: the work often takes just a few hours. No dismantling of the unit is required.
  • Substantial cost savings: there is no expenditure on dismantling, transport and reassembly.
  • Balancing the system as a whole: the main advantage — it takes account of real conditions: the stiffness of the foundation, the state of the bearings, the couplings and shaft alignment.
  • Versatility: suitable for large equipment and equipment that is difficult to dismantle.
  • Work on site: the specialist comes to you, with no need to transport the rotor anywhere.

Disadvantages

  • It requires access to the rotor: there must be a way to fit the correction weights.
  • Starts and stops are required: the process needs 3-4 start-up cycles of the equipment for measurement.
  • The influence of external factors: vibration from neighbouring equipment or unstable speed can complicate the work.

A detailed comparison table

Criterion On a balancing machine In situ (on site)
Accuracy High for an individual component High for the system as a whole under real conditions
Downtime Days/weeks (dismantling, logistics, reassembly) Hours (usually 2-4 hours)
Total cost High (includes dismantling, reassembly, transport) Medium (depends on the cost of the specialist's visit)
Dismantling Mandatory Not required
Accounts for system factors No (an individual part is balanced) Yes (foundation, bearings, couplings, alignment)
Where it applies New parts, after repair, series production Equipment in service, large components

We will help you choose the optimal balancing method

Advice on choosing the balancing method for your particular equipment.

Request a consultation

How to choose the optimal method: a decision checklist

Choose WORKSHOP balancing if:

  • You are balancing a new part before installation.
  • The rotor is fresh from an overhaul or manufacture.
  • The part is small and easy to remove.
  • You require very high accuracy (grade G1.0 or better).
  • Accompanying mechanical work is needed (turning, weld build-up).
  • Downtime is not critical.

Choose IN-SITU balancing (on site) if:

  • The equipment is large (big fans, induced-draught fans).
  • Dismantling is difficult, expensive or impossible.
  • Downtime is critical (production cannot wait).
  • The rotor operates as part of a complex system (couplings, drive).
  • Real installation conditions need to be taken into account.
  • You need to eliminate vibration in the whole unit, not just the rotor.
💡 Practice shows: a rotor balanced perfectly on the machine may vibrate once installed in the unit if shaft alignment is out, the bearings are worn or the foundation is weak. That is why a combined approach is often used for complex equipment: a rough balance on the machine first, then final fine-tuning on site.

Practical application examples

Example 1: a boiler induced-draught fan

The task: elevated vibration in a 200 kW induced-draught fan.

The solution: in-situ balancing of the impeller.

The rationale: removing the impeller would have meant shutting the boiler down for several days. The in-situ balancing was completed in 3 hours during a planned shutdown.

Example 2: an electric-motor armature after rewinding

The task: balancing a 30 kW armature after the winding was rewound.

The solution: workshop balancing in the repair shop.

The rationale: the armature had already been removed for repair. Workshop balancing provides high accuracy and is convenient, since the part is already in the workshop.

Conclusion

Both methods — workshop balancing and in-situ balancing alike — eliminate imbalance effectively when carried out correctly. The choice depends on the specific situation:

  • If the rotor is easy to remove and requires high accuracy — the machine.
  • If dismantling is difficult, time is critical or system factors need to be taken into account — in-situ balancing.

Many specialist centres offer both kinds of service: they have their own balancing machines for various rotor sizes as well as mobile teams for visits to customers.

Rotor balancing

Instruments for in-situ balancing and workshop balancing services.

The Balanset-1A instrument

For in-situ balancing on site.

Buy the instrument

Balancing services

Workshop balancing and visits to customers.

Order the service
💬 Contact us on WhatsApp